And the winner is:
FOSWIKI
Free and Open Source Wiki
Now,
GET WILD
First preference
Name |
Percentage |
Absolute |
foswiki |
24.00% |
24 |
contutto |
15.00% |
15 |
cocomint |
14.00% |
14 |
lewiki |
12.00% |
12 |
youdit |
10.00% |
10 |
coolabora |
9.00% |
9 |
librett |
8.00% |
8 |
powerpaper |
5.00% |
5 |
powowiki |
3.00% |
3 |
Second preference
Name |
Percentage |
Absolute |
coolabora |
17.00% |
17 |
foswiki |
15.00% |
15 |
librett |
13.00% |
13 |
contutto |
12.00% |
12 |
lewiki |
11.00% |
11 |
powerpaper |
11.00% |
11 |
youdit |
10.00% |
10 |
cocomint |
7.00% |
7 |
powowiki |
4.00% |
4 |
1st or 2nd preference
votes for names as first or second choice
Name |
Percentage |
Absolute |
foswiki |
39.00% |
39 |
contutto |
27.00% |
27 |
coolabora |
26.00% |
26 |
lewiki |
23.00% |
23 |
librett |
21.00% |
21 |
cocomint |
21.00% |
21 |
youdit |
20.00% |
20 |
powerpaper |
16.00% |
16 |
powowiki |
7.00% |
7 |
Least preferred
Name |
Percentage |
Absolute |
powowiki |
26.00% |
26 |
cocomint |
23.00% |
23 |
powerpaper |
13.00% |
13 |
contutto |
11.00% |
11 |
youdit |
11.00% |
11 |
coolabora |
10.00% |
10 |
foswiki |
4.00% |
4 |
librett |
1.00% |
1 |
lewiki |
1.00% |
1 |
Combined preference
sum of 1st preference (2 points), 2nd preference (1 point), least preferred (-2 points)
Name |
Score |
foswiki |
55 |
lewiki |
33 |
librett |
27 |
contutto |
20 |
coolabora |
15 |
youdit |
8 |
powerpaper |
-5 |
cocomint |
-11 |
powowiki |
-42 |
Average score of names on questionnaire
orderd by combined preference score
Name |
Question 1 |
Question 2 |
Question 3 |
Question 4 |
Question 5 |
Question 6 |
foswiki |
3.69 |
4.72 |
3.92 |
3.83 |
3.40 |
3.44 |
lewiki |
3.32 |
3.82 |
3.34 |
3.49 |
3.04 |
3.35 |
librett |
2.89 |
3.06 |
2.95 |
3.51 |
3.19 |
3.24 |
contutto |
2.94 |
3.15 |
2.78 |
3.05 |
2.92 |
2.85 |
coolabora |
3.27 |
4.02 |
3.23 |
3.11 |
3.50 |
3.17 |
youdit |
3.12 |
3.30 |
2.93 |
2.89 |
2.96 |
2.93 |
powerpaper |
2.84 |
3.23 |
2.88 |
3.63 |
3.25 |
3.24 |
cocomint |
3.03 |
2.49 |
2.53 |
2.50 |
3.18 |
2.68 |
powowiki |
2.10 |
3.02 |
2.38 |
2.12 |
2.34 |
2.36 |
Questions were:
- Please indicate your first impression of each name.
- How would you evaluate each name based on its compatibility with the concept?
- How would you evaluate each name based on how its ability to represent a product that is better than the original TWiki?
- How would you evaluate each name based on its suitability for professional customers?
- How would you evaluate each name based on its ability to represent an innovative product?
- How would you evaluate each name based on its ability to represent a product that is a leader in its area ?